PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .294vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 24%Curveball 21%Sinker 11%Cutter 9%Knuckle Curve 1%Slider 1%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 JN Josh Naylor LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CY Cole Young LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CR Cal Raleigh SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 642 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LR Luke Raley LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Raley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CE Colt Emerson LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Emerson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BD Brendan Donovan LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brendan Donovan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LR Leo Rivas SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leo Rivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.