PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 22%Curveball 22%Sinker 11%Cutter 11%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-02 game page →