PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .294vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 24%Curveball 21%Sinker 11%Cutter 9%Knuckle Curve 1%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.