PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 22%Curveball 22%Sinker 11%Cutter 11%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.