PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .303vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 23%Curveball 22%Sinker 11%Cutter 10%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jose Siri RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Tyler Heineman SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Heineman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-25 game page →