PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Cutter 31%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%Curveball 8%Splitter 6%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .429 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.