PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .304vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026
Cutter 31%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Sinker 10%Curveball 10%Splitter 6%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WC Willi Castro SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KK Kyle Karros RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-23 game page →