PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 15%Changeup 12%Sinker 10%Curveball 9%Splitter 6%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.