PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Curveball 10%Sinker 10%Splitter 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 653 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-06 game page →