PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Cutter 31%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 16%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%Curveball 8%Splitter 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BS Bryson Stott LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Justin Crawford LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH Derek Hill RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Derek Hill
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.