PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026
Cutter 30%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sweeper 15%Sinker 11%Changeup 10%Curveball 10%Splitter 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →