PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 12%Sinker 10%Curveball 9%Splitter 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 709 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.