PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Curveball 10%Sinker 10%Splitter 6%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 FL Francisco Lindor SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-06 game page →