PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 12%Sinker 10%Curveball 9%Splitter 6%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 618 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .375
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .433 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MV Mark Vientos RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.