PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026
Cutter 30%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sweeper 15%Sinker 11%Changeup 10%Curveball 10%Splitter 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.