PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .264vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Curveball 10%Sinker 10%Splitter 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 646 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DS Daniel Susac RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 JR Jesus Rodriguez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesus Rodriguez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 1 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.