PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Sinker 10%Curveball 9%Splitter 6%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 628 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.