PITCHER MATCHUP

Foster Griffin vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Foster Griffin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Foster Griffin's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .264vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Curveball 10%Sinker 10%Splitter 6%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Foster Griffin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 581 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →