PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .286vs RHH xwOBA .271Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 6%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Ben Rice LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-09 game page →