PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Cutter 30%Sinker 23%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .373
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.