PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .280Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.