PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%Sweeper 3%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.