PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .286vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 7%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.