PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .289vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 6%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.