PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .274Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Cutter 32%Sinker 23%Changeup 5%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →