PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Cutter 30%Sinker 23%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 648 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.