PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Rasmussen vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Rasmussen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Rasmussen's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .287vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Cutter 31%Sinker 23%Changeup 6%Curveball 4%Sweeper 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Rasmussen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.