PITCHER MATCHUP

David Peterson vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Peterson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Peterson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .360Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Slider 21%Changeup 14%Curveball 12%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Peterson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-01 game page →