PITCHER MATCHUP

David Peterson vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Peterson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Peterson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .357Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Slider 21%Changeup 14%Curveball 12%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Peterson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.