PITCHER MATCHUP

David Peterson vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Peterson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Peterson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .357Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Slider 21%Changeup 14%Curveball 12%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Peterson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-12 game page →