PITCHER MATCHUP

David Peterson vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Peterson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Peterson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .357Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Slider 21%Changeup 14%Curveball 12%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Peterson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.