PITCHER MATCHUP

David Peterson vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Peterson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Peterson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .352Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 30%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Slider 21%Changeup 14%Curveball 12%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Peterson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 581 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.