PITCHER MATCHUP

Daniel Lynch IV vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Daniel Lynch IV's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Daniel Lynch IV's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .266vs RHH xwOBA .336Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 27%Sinker 23%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Knuckle Curve 8%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Daniel Lynch IV, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-12 game page →