PITCHER MATCHUP

Daniel Lynch IV vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Daniel Lynch IV's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Daniel Lynch IV's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 26%Slider 24%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Knuckle Curve 9%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Daniel Lynch IV, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.