PITCHER MATCHUP

Cristian Javier vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cristian Javier's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cristian Javier's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Sweeper 26%Changeup 17%Knuckle Curve 5%Sinker 5%Cutter 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cristian Javier, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 695 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 598 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .461 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-10 game page →