PITCHER MATCHUP

Carlos Rodón vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Carlos Rodón's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Carlos Rodón's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 27%Changeup 15%Sinker 9%Curveball 4%Cutter 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Carlos Rodón, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 EQ Edgar Quero SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.