PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 25%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Curveball 10%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EQ Edgar Quero SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-22 game page →