PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .432 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.