PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .430 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TP Tristan Peters LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.