PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.