PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 10%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Colt Keith LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 486 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.