PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .364vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 10%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TW Taylor Walls SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NF Nick Fortes RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BW Ben Williamson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Williamson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.