PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 9%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Junior Caminero RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RP Richie Palacios LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NF Nick Fortes RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.