PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.