PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .427 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.