PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .364Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Curveball 10%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CN Connor Norby RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-23 game page →