PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 OC Owen Caissie LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.