PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.