PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .364vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 10%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 585 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Daniel Susac RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CK Christian Koss RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.