PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.