PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 9%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 587 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →