PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .338Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 25%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 9%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-29 game page →