PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.