PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .350Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Curveball 10%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AR Austin Riley RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MH Michael Harris II LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Dominic Smith LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Jorge Mateo RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Mateo
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EW Eli White RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eli White
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-17 game page →