PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .351vs RHH xwOBA .343Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 9%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.