PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 10%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.