PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 9%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.