PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .368Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Curveball 10%Slider 5%Changeup 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DV Daulton Varsho LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daulton Varsho
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GS George Springer RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-27 game page →