PITCHER MATCHUP

Cal Quantrill vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cal Quantrill's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cal Quantrill's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Splitter 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 10%Slider 4%Changeup 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cal Quantrill, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-12 game page →