PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 20%Sinker 13%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 6%Cutter 2%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JJ Josh Jung RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-24 game page →