PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Sinker 12%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .225 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.