PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Sinker 12%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 OC Owen Caissie LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.