PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 21%Sinker 12%Slider 9%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 606 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.