PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Sinker 12%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .267
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.