PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 21%Sinker 12%Slider 9%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 6%Cutter 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-18 game page →