PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Sinker 12%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.