PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Sinker 12%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 7%Cutter 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.