PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 21%Sinker 12%Slider 9%Knuckle Curve 7%Sweeper 6%Cutter 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.