PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Miller vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Miller's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 19%Sinker 13%Slider 10%Knuckle Curve 8%Sweeper 6%Cutter 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-02 game page →