PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryce Elder vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryce Elder's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryce Elder's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%Slider 30%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Changeup 10%Cutter 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryce Elder, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-25 game page →