PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jake Mangum SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JT Jared Triolo RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HD Henry Davis RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.