PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BL Brandon Lowe SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MO Marcell Ozuna RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcell Ozuna
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JM Jake Mangum SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HD Henry Davis RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →