PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BL Brandon Lowe SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JT Jared Triolo RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HD Henry Davis RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 EV Esmerlyn Valdez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Esmerlyn Valdez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JG Jacob Gonzalez LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Gonzalez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.