PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.