PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .432 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-09 game page →