PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 7%Cutter 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 675 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .428 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.