PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BS Bryson Stott LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.