PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs San Diego Padres

How the San Diego Padres's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 7%

How the San Diego Padres's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Diego Padres's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 FT Fernando Tatis Jr. RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Fernando Tatis Jr.
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jackson Merrill LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Merrill
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Manny Machado RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Manny Machado
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 XB Xander Bogaerts RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xander Bogaerts
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GS Gavin Sheets LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gavin Sheets
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TF Ty France RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ty France
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 SS Sung-Mun Song LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sung-Mun Song
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RD Rodolfo Durán RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rodolfo Durán
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 ST Samad Taylor SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samad Taylor
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.