PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs San Diego Padres

How the San Diego Padres's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the San Diego Padres's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Diego Padres's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 FT Fernando Tatis Jr. RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Fernando Tatis Jr.
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jackson Merrill LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Merrill
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Manny Machado RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Manny Machado
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 XB Xander Bogaerts RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xander Bogaerts
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JC Jake Cronenworth LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Cronenworth
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FF Freddy Fermin RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddy Fermin
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LC Luis Campusano RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Campusano
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SS Sung-Mun Song LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sung-Mun Song
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ST Samad Taylor SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samad Taylor
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.