PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs San Diego Padres

How the San Diego Padres's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the San Diego Padres's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Diego Padres's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 FT Fernando Tatis Jr. RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Fernando Tatis Jr.
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jackson Merrill LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Merrill
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Manny Machado RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Manny Machado
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 XB Xander Bogaerts RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xander Bogaerts
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GS Gavin Sheets LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gavin Sheets
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TF Ty France RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ty France
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LR Luis Rengifo SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Rengifo
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JC Jake Cronenworth LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Cronenworth
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 FF Freddy Fermin RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddy Fermin
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.