PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 TW Taylor Ward RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LT Leody Taveras SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CM Coby Mayo RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .221 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AR Adley Rutschman SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BA Blaze Alexander RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blaze Alexander
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Colton Cowser LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-03 game page →