PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .215 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CE Christian Encarnacion-Strand RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Encarnacion-Strand
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.