PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .449 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.