PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .299
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →