PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .440 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.