PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .375
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .422 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.