PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 32%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Cutter 7%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MS Marcus Semien RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Carson Benge LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Juan Soto LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .432 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 MV Mark Vientos RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →