PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .379
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .430 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.