PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 7%Cutter 7%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 LJ Leo Jiménez RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leo Jiménez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-15 game page →