PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.