PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 45%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 7%Cutter 7%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CY Cole Young LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JN Josh Naylor LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 560 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 613 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 VR Victor Robles RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Robles
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.