PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 46%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 JN Josh Naylor LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CY Cole Young LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 642 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 545 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 WW Weston Wilson RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Weston Wilson
    • Sinker (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.