PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .350vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JN Josh Naylor LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CY Cole Young LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CR Cal Raleigh SH .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LR Luke Raley LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Raley
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 CE Colt Emerson LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Emerson
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MG Mitch Garver RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mitch Garver
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-22 game page →