PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Cutter 7%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-28 game page →