PITCHER MATCHUP

Brady Singer vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brady Singer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brady Singer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .351vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 45%Slider 31%Sweeper 10%Cutter 7%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brady Singer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 649 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 581 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (45% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.